What is a Reverse Jade Lizard?
Generates premium but creates substantial upside risk if uncovered.
Sell a higher-strike put and buy a lower-strike put to define downside risk.
Core structure
| Leg | Action | Example Strike |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buy to Open Put | $90 Put |
| 2 | Sell to Open Put | $95 Put |
| 3 | Sell to Open Call | $110 Call |
All options use the same expiration.
When to use it
| Situation | Fit? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral to moderately bearish | Good fit | You want the stock to stay below the short call and ideally above the short put. |
| Want premium income | Good fit | You collect premium from the short call and short put. |
| Want defined downside risk | Good fit | The long put caps the downside spread loss. |
| Expect a sharp rally | Poor fit | The naked short call creates large upside risk. |
| Want fully defined risk on both sides | Poor fit | The upside remains undefined unless a long call is added. |
Worked example
Assume a stock trades near $100.
| Leg | Strike | Premium |
|---|---|---|
| Buy Put | $90 | Pay $1.00 = -$100 |
| Sell Put | $95 | Receive $3.00 = +$300 |
| Sell Call | $110 | Receive $3.00 = +$300 |
The key Reverse Jade Lizard rule
The put-spread width is:
The total credit is also:
Maximum profit
Maximum profit is the total premium received if the stock finishes between the short put and short call.
Upper break-even
Above $115, losses grow as the stock continues rising.
What happens on the downside?
Below $95, the short put starts losing value, but the long $90 put caps that spread loss.
Because the trade collected $500 total credit:
What happens at expiration?
| Stock Price | Approximate Outcome |
|---|---|
| $80 | Approximately $0 in this example |
| $90 | Approximately $0 |
| $95 | +$500 max profit |
| $100 | +$500 max profit |
| $110 | +$500 max profit |
| $115 | Upper break-even |
| $130 | Large loss from short call |
The biggest risk: upside
The short call is not protected by a long call.
Reverse Jade Lizard vs. Jade Lizard
| Feature | Reverse Jade Lizard | Jade Lizard |
|---|---|---|
| Market bias | Neutral to bearish | Neutral to bullish |
| Uncovered leg | Short call | Short put |
| Defined side | Downside | Upside |
| Main tail risk | Sharp rally | Sharp decline |
Reverse Jade Lizard vs. Iron Condor
| Feature | Reverse Jade Lizard | Iron Condor |
|---|---|---|
| Protective put | Yes | Yes |
| Protective call | No | Yes |
| Downside risk | Defined | Defined |
| Upside risk | Undefined | Defined |
| Credit potential | Usually higher | Usually lower |
Assignment risk
Can be assigned, though the long put defines downside spread risk.
Can be assigned and may create a short-stock position if uncovered.
Pros and cons
- Large premium potential.
- Defined downside risk.
- Can be structured with no downside loss.
- Time decay often helps.
- More controlled than a naked Short Strangle on the downside.
- Undefined upside risk remains.
- Short-call assignment risk.
- Margin can expand sharply on a rally.
- Three legs increase complexity.
- A large upside move can overwhelm collected premium.
How to close it
Close as one three-leg order when possible.
Common mistakes
- Assuming “no downside risk” means the whole trade is low risk.
- Ignoring the theoretically unlimited short-call risk.
- Failing to verify that credit is at least equal to the put-spread width.
- Using the strategy before a major upside catalyst.
- Ignoring margin expansion during a rally.
- Not planning for short-call assignment.
Beginner checklist
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| ☐ Market view | Am I neutral to moderately bearish? |
| ☐ Put width | What is the width of the bull put spread? |
| ☐ Total credit | Is it at least as large as the put-spread width? |
| ☐ Upper break-even | How far can the stock rise before I lose money? |
| ☐ Assignment | What happens if the short call is assigned? |
| ☐ Margin | Can my account handle a sharp upside move? |
| ☐ Events | Are earnings or major upside catalysts inside the trade window? |
| ☐ Alternative | Would an Iron Condor better match my risk tolerance? |
Key takeaway
Use it when you want premium income with a neutral-to-bearish outlook and want to define downside risk.
The central trade-off is: defined downside, but substantial and theoretically unlimited upside risk from the uncovered call.